Related topics

xfs internal error on a new filesystem
gh...@vax1.umkc.edu comp os os2 misc I'm disappointed about OS/2. Maybe this should be in advocacy, but perhaps if I post here, maybe someone would have some solutions. I have been using OS/2 since last June (when I kicked MS-DOS/windows out of my hard drive and formated the hard drive into HPFS file system),

ccd questions
We observe, however, that nearly 40% of Oracle administrators choose to build their Oracle databases on top of a file system for ease-of-manageability, Oracle Symmetric Replication can be extremely I/O intensive in OLTP databases, and our performance testing using UFS datafiles has been disappointing.

опять о пyти к коpзине
Does anyone know how to derive the name of the filesystem within which a given object resides, on Linux? On Solaris it's present in the structure returned by statvfs(); the f_basetype But these options are all really ugly and disappointing. Note that /etc/mtab is not reliable, because you can mount with "-n".

NT versus Linux
In fact, we have been using reiserfs for a long period of time, and we have suffered from several filesystem corruption incidents, so we decided to switch to xfs hoping that it is more stable and corrupts less than reiserfs, but it was disappointing to get this problem after just 48 hours from reformating a

Spiralog information
Finally, though you can set the log size, I don't see anything that determines where the log is written (hint: Not on the damaged file system under test, duh) It's disappointing that NT's writers have done the usual MS thing of widening the gap between old and new by artificially making the old worse (inability to

Query: Terrible Samba performance Linux->Win98
So manual installation is required with system file editing. I can do vi and have some knowledge of the file system, but all attempts resulted in failure. Mine, wiith SuSe and the main board are a disappointing 19 or so. Asus had an article on support page showing much better rates for both Suse,

New SiSoft Sandra 2001
Users should be able to see resources whether they are stored by a directory service, file system, or database. Just as the logical drive F is a natural extension of the physical model used by Its a little disappointing that IBM didn't allow the user to allow the volume names to show instead of the device name.

Advanced XIP File System
David Empson demp...@actrix.gen.nz comp sys mac portables comp sys mac system cab <v...@nospam.com> wrote: Disappointing series of problems. You had some major file system corruption, which Disk First Aid couldn't fix. At this point, I'd have turned to DiskWarrior, or if I didn't have it, I'd have done a

Performance/compability of Samba
Moving to Unix on a M68010 was disappointing, it seemed so sluggish. Why does Unix go slower on a faster CPU? Compiling programs took soooo much longer. The main difference I could think of was that the filesystem operations were wildly different. The RT11 filesystem should be simple enough for your test.

Drive drops out using 2.4.21-0.25mdk
I didn't think it would be dependent on available storage as I was thinking along the lines of the file system. You know you have a max of 255 file names in the I wonder if timers are now limited in the latest software because I know I wasn't dreaming when I had 58 timers set. :( This is disappointing news.

Unstable, crashes & hangs, data loss -> erase ...
It's disappointing that Linux has difficulty with NTFS, as 90% of my machines *are* NTFS with just a few FAT32 partitions here and there. I found "AT" 's response (thanks AT! It is very possible to read such a file system since even if one does not do it "right", reading alone does no damage.

want to install win200, but i have issues...
Does anyone know what the /dev/shm file system is? Something to do with shared memory, maybe? As you see, I am grasping at straws. Some are less surprising but disappointing. Gnome works fine on 4000Q4 but it appears to be quite broken on SuSE 7.1. I guess no one at SuSE uses Gnome. Some process (gdm?

Defrag Program
Indeed, threads share a lot: file system info, file descriptor table, signal handlers and last but not least run in the same memory space. Even if you would manage to implement such a model, the results shall be likely disappointing IMOH. Indeed, threads naturally tend to communicate with each others,

Priceless 1985 Lorraine/Amiga quote !!
The other partitions on a Mac drive are NEVER affected when you delete a file partition or change its file system. How disappointing. Only ATX motherboards have hardware that allows software shutdown. Any other PC needs to be shut off by the power switch after shut down, no matter what OS is on it.

Comparison of NTFS/MFT recovery software?
The bureau will likely end up using commercially available programs to create a new automated case file system. Mueller said the FBI hoped to recoup .... "Needless to say, Mr. Chairman," Mr. Mueller said to Senator Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire, "after three and a half years, this was disappointing news.

DO NOT INSTALL 2.4.15/2.5.0 - FILE SYSTEM CORRUPTION
Paul "Aaron Bertrand [MVP]" wrote: I have the following configs: P][ 400 128 MB Tri-boot (FAT file system): NT 5.0 Workstation B2 NT 4.0 SP4 Win98 P][ 300 512 MB I don't know what background services/apps you have running, but I for one don't find NT5 all that disappointing at all... and the versions I'm using

BrowsForFolder does not return file-extension
It is hugely disappointing that 2.4.15 is barfed though (as was 2.4.11) this is not acceptable for a stable tree. Linus should take more care, but then he is more devel kernel anyway. regards, Thing Cliff Pratt wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:55:09 GMT, da...@deletethis.afterswish.com (David Preece) wrote: What if

7100 DP Timers [someone's in error!!]
I deleted and changed the file system on my F: drive, where mandrake had been installed, I fixed the mbr sector with ranish, I restored the content of the C: drive The mepis.org web site was a little disappointing, after the rich and generous material at the gentoo site. I was digging around for hours at gentoo

Watershed date 10/15/98?
What was so disappointing with most (or all) of the NTFS recovery software I looked at was they all were just trying to recover your data. Data recovery software is written with the intent to recover data, not to lecture you on file system structures. The strength of data recovery software is often the ability

Query: Terrible Samba performance Linux->Win98
wc -l" which gives a feeling for the filesystem speed. The results were very disappointing. It took 151s on the scratch volume for "find . | wc -l". There were 141238 files which means 935 files/s (aka findstones :). Running this command was a little bit faster (132 s, 1069 files/s). Especially the second run