Related topics

Hibernation problem: 12 GB IDE disk + Thinkpad 365xd + Warp 4 + ...
cab v...@nospam.com comp sys mac portables comp sys mac system David Empson wrote: cab <v...@nospam.com> wrote: Disappointing series of problems. You had some major file system corruption, which Disk First Aid couldn't fix. At this point, I'd have turned to DiskWarrior, or if I didn't have it, I'd have done a

Apple's market share at 10%
Not owning the top of the filesystem hierarchy. Some of the above might be un-Mac-like, but they're a huge help to less experienced users, and they really don't hurt anyone. OSX is pretty disappointing so far. However, I've been using OS X Server since it came out. Pretty good for a Unix interface.

New File System in OS/2 2.2/3.0 ??
There is something disappointing about a Linux machine of any kind without a proper shell. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

FAT32 vs. NTFS
Everything was working fine, but the filesystem was up around 92% full, hence the upgrade. I first replaced the 3 x 80 GB drives with 3 x 200 GB Western Digital drives (WD2000BB) and installed Mandrake 9.1, with disappointing results. To make a long story short, the XFS file system over RAID5 spammed my log files

Installing LaTeX2e: A Suggestion
If it didn't set errno, this is perhaps disappointing, but it doesn't cause any major problems. We seem to be arguing past each other. .... The message _appears_, alas, to be unambiguous: File name too long It might be wrong. Consider the old System V file system. This is a file name which would provoke that error:

Get Ready for VistaSpeak -- and a partial translation
Win2K supports both FAT and NTFS file systems, don't worry about it. I've never attempted to upgrade ME to 2000, mostly because we decided to stop selling the Win9x product family around the time that ME came out, and so I have little experience with it, other than - like you - I found it a very disappointing

Will Suse be it?
My WordPefect software popped up with an error message "internal file system error" that was nowhere in the documentation and that did nothing to explain to the user what to do next. (And it turns out the error has nothing to do with file systems!) I had the bad luck that this error popped up after my 180 days of

Ultra 100 TX2 Update!
A consumer DAT would be one option, your computer possibly another assuming you have a combination of disk space and file system that will allow you to record in Discount VCR's tend to last 5 years in my household, and to cost less than service on a top quality VCR, sure - their sound quality is disappointing,

ZipMagic like IFS for OS/2 wanted.
--------Enchanter--------- Actually, according to some magazine (PC Computing, maybe; I forget) the MMX they tried out was pretty disappointing. Things like the file system, which is why file acccess on the mac is so slow compared to other systems. I got it direct from one of apple's techs that OS 8 is supposed

tmp in Ram (Was: RAM Disk Speed Tests)
Chris O'Riley Chris_ORi...@usa.net comp sys be advocacy What happens if you use Windows NT's NTFS filesystem? What about FAT32 in Windows 98? And before you tell me that installing OS/2 on an HPFS drive would have made all the difference, I tried it with the same disappointing results. -Chis.

Priceless 1985 Lorraine/Amiga quote !!
Having each OS support each other OSes filesystem is probably not practical, especially when you have something like Linux or the Amiga, They won't survive FTP (ZModem might work, though, Amiganetfs and Envoy work, of course), and that's a bit disappointing, but chances are, you won't notice.

Copy-on-write for filesystems
One thing I have found disappointing with GoBack on an XP system (as opposed to a 9x system) is the restore history. I attribute this to the increased overhead in the way of disk activity with XP and the NTFS file system. On the plus side with the increased stability of XP and the NTFS file system I've never

Live-CD resolutions
Believe me both are showing how bad Win98 file system cache for HD throughput... Both are showing superb fast performance of my HD with default Sandra options (incl. 'Do not use Windows cache'), but when I turn off the Don't use Win Cache checkbox in Sandra, the result is very disappointing, Based on what Sandra

SCSI Sony SDT-5000 still useless
Disappointing. After a while, someone posted success setting up the disk with the disk manager (Ontracks or IBM OEM version for their large disks), as follows: (a) It seems that the rest of the file system is run as some sort of large virtual / extended partition. Anyway, I tried it, and it -- sort of -- works.

Can XCOPY clone an NTFS partition?
NeXT elected to do "something" on their own, and that "something" will apparently be Enterprise Objects, which is a high-end object management system, not a universal file system. It's rather disappointing, but it is unclear whether NeXT even -should- pioneer something like that on their own.

7DXR, 2 DIMMs => stable, 3 DIMMS => BSOD
There appears to be a dichotomy in the handling of file system errors. CHKDSK will run or CHKDSK will not run is the dividing point. If CHKDSK will run, it does its work and What was so disappointing with most (or all) of the NTFS recovery software I looked at was they all were just trying to recover your data.

EMC to IBM SAN LUN replication
This is disappointing as I believe this is a fairly common virus that has been around for a while and this is the reason I bought NAV. I have been running NAV against all file opens. .... NT will most likely display "Illegal instructions - the applications xxx attempted to write directly to the file system", etc.

Long audio recording with quality. Hi-Fi S-VHS?
I use 'em both because of a somewhat disappointing history with GoBack. On a Win9x box GoBack keeps a couple three of weeks of history. On an XP box (using NTFS) the most I ever get is 5 or 6 days (even with the maximum GoBack buffer of 4GB. used), due I presume to the added overhead of the NTFS file system.

thread migration on Linux
Ah yes, I was forgetting that most file metadata is kept in the filesystem metadata spaces. [snip] No. It has a metadata mechanism that can implement .... They won't survive FTP (ZModem might work, though, Amiganetfs and Envoy work, of course), and that's a bit disappointing, but chances are, you won't notice. Yes.

tmp in Ram (Was: RAM Disk Speed Tests)
For example, Storage Computer has a disk subsystem that can today sustain reads of 22 MBps and sustain writes of 7 MBps from the disk drive to the file system. This does presume you have enough drives in the subsystem (about 12 gives peak performance, 48 drives is the max) and enough SCSI host adapters (12 is the