Related topics

OS/2 Crashes Often, Disappointing...
or NTFS (a very good file system, definitely a generation ahead of HPFS IMHO). Chicago, on the other hand, the OS for the masses, from what I understand, will ONLY offer users the kludge-FAT system, which is GROSSLY disappointing for an 'advanced' operating system.

Disappointing disk performance
Considering I actually went as far as adding a "make test" target in src/sbin/newfs then it is a tiny bit disappointing that it was not used pre-commit. [yn] ^C ***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED DIRTY ***** bang# -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer

Priceless 1985 Lorraine/Amiga quote !!
Cheers, Frank "Frank R. Pyatt" wrote: ********UPDATE******** I downloaded the file ezsig.exe from the PowerQuest FTP site and ran it from a WindowsME boot disk. Very disappointing. If you can't count on the tech support, why would anyone bother actually buying software!?! Now for the problem: NTFS is still

GS Appleshare Server available ?
Not only has the eroding legacy hardware support been a great disappointment, the lack of any userbase input regarding my troubles with such legacy hardware has been even more disappointing. I sorrows me to have to file away 5 years of know how and experience with this what used to be wonderful operating system,

No help...
Hierarchical filesystem? Mac 86. The Mac Plus and maybe the 512ke used HFS, now being replaced by HFS+. The original had the appearance of being hierarchical, but was actually flat Still, it's a little disappointing to see breakthroughs like the trackpad wind up in Wintel portables after only a couple of years.

Life, stderr, and everything (was Re: malloc() as a user...)
I have the following configs: P][ 400 128 MB Tri-boot (FAT file system): NT 5.0 Workstation B2 NT 4.0 SP4 Win98 P][ 300 512 MB Tri-boot (FAT file system): I don't know what background services/apps you have running, but I for one don't find NT5 all that disappointing at all... and the versions I'm using haven't

Better FS's (was Re: New .96c , disappointing... : ( )
Why is it disappointing? Is raw speed really that important? It's not like it was 5x slower or anything. 25% slower on identical hardware is a lot. I suspect the build would be slower if it had been done in a UFS file system and not a tmpfs file system. So, my question then is: What is being done to make

migrating PMDF from VMS to UNIX
BeOS gives you no practical alternative, so filesystem permissions end up with little practical relevance. That makes sense from the point of view where filesystem permissions are intended to keep one user from messing with another. It could be disappointing if you felt that filesystem permissions ought to help

What's the Most un-Mac-like thing in OS X?
It has been described as a "file system within a file", and this allows a convinient segregation of data even within a single object. .... They won't survive FTP (ZModem might work, though, Amiganetfs and Envoy work, of course), and that's a bit disappointing, but chances are, you won't notice. Yes.

Wazzu.A virus
Some people also have tools for increasing the size of a ufs file system, but they still need work. That's my understanding. Even if you can get one, the performance is disappointing. In addition, I don't think you can't access the on-board management software from FreeBSD. I don't think you can access the on-board

Net Value 4/10/95
Does anyone know what the /dev/shm file system is? Something to do with shared memory, maybe? As you see, I am grasping at straws. Yep, shared memory, new flavor. Some are less surprising but disappointing. Gnome works fine on 4000Q4 but it appears to be quite broken on SuSE 7.1. I guess no one at SuSE uses Gnome.

Unstable, crashes & hangs, data loss -> erase ...
I know its disappointing but we feel its best just to be honest about it. Once you have the rework done the boards will be fine. 0x00000024 NTFS_FILE_SYSTEM All file system bug checks have encoded in their first ULONG the source file and the line within the source file that generated the bug check.

New Raid 0- 3 Drives 133ata slower than 2 Raid 100ata?
Microsoft is still reeling from the disappointing Windows 95 sales, is frustrated by the reluctance of most business users to move ahead with Windows .... But many major productivity advantages in the Mac weren't tested -- things like built-in scripting, easier configuration, and a much easier to use file system.

.Net won't compile "on the net" (Q255252/uSoft does not supp ...
Hmmm, after some actual testing, the results are disappointing. Also, I found a glitch - NetPositive saves its history as bookmarks in /tmp and then moves I am considering developping a tmpfs file system. Me too. That's my next project, a file-system based RAM disk. No : a file-system based RAM disk that can be

WP tech support disappointing
Hurd translators only go from a filesystem to a program contained within that filesystem, portals go inside and outside. ..... And current AI research is somewhat disappointing, with the exception of neural nets. I would certainly not want the AI to stare at icons -- whatever an icon is, anyway; I've seen (at

Want to map symbolic links as Windows Shortcuts
The backups (Lucy/Win98->Fred/Win98) copied over my TR> 10BaseT network with an average rate of about 250 kByte/sec, measured TR> using the System Monitor on Fred and watching File-system bytes TR> written. While disappointing (theoretical maximum is about 4 times TR> that rate; the Ethernet is otherwise idle as

Unix on PowerPC Macs (Online documentation, etc.) (long)
The Spiralog file system was based on a very interesting theoretical file system design, but the design was found somewhat impractical and the performance somewhat disappointing in actual use. Based on this and based on the relatively few sites that had implemented it, support for Spiralog was removed.

linux <-> Solarix 86 speeds building gcc
=Yes, I'd consider this result disappointing as well. May I assume =that the performance improved with increasing the ileave factor? can be quickly brought back up in case of a drive failure (any one of the 4 disks can go, even two different ones can go), while providing one big partition for a big file-system.

file permissions
The boot.fs is a filesystem image which contains /boot and the /netbsd.ram image in some form, I forget whether it's gziped or not. Only having a 1000KB partion on you're nifty 1GB SCSI drive is sort of disappointing. But just a few days ago I found that using "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd0c count=2000 bs=512"

Better FS's (was Re: New .96c , disappointing... : ( )
BrowseForFolder _ (0, "message", configuration, ["]root folder["]) message: 2 short lines max root folder: folder string or system folder code configuration: integer bitwise code 0001 1 only return file system folders (do not return virtual folders) 0002 2 do not include network folders below domain level 0010 16